« who's afraid of middle america hating the media because of the gays | Main | announcing: the internet! »
March 08, 2006
purely hypothetical
this to this:
me: hey, a question: in places where prostitution is illegal, do both parties get in trouble...the buyer and the seller? i assume so, but am not sure.
devlyn: you are correct in thinking that both the puchaser and the seller are in fault.
me: so, if someone paid you for a quick bj and you were caught mid-act, both you and the gentleman would be arrested and/or fined?
devlyn: that would be correct.
i'm glad we cleared that up.
in other news, there is no other news. i've lost interest in most everything. except gilmore girls.
Posted by Zach at March 8, 2006 11:02 AM
Comments
I am now never watching the Gilmore Girls out of sheer obstinacity.
And really, the part in the first response, "the seller are in fault." should actually be, "the seller are at fault." I should really edit what I write. Always.
Posted by: Devlyn at March 8, 2006 04:06 PM
I wrote a paper on Boise prostitutes during the Victorian era. Aaaah...tradition!!!!!
Posted by: lolers at March 9, 2006 03:32 PM
now lolers' paper sounds quite interesting...
other than that, i have nothing to say apart from the fact that i have never watched the gilmore girls.
Posted by: marshmallow at March 15, 2006 12:59 AM
